In Andrew Jackson, Trump finds a flawed role model
Unlike most presidents, Trump doesn’t consider himself a student of history. He’s not much of a reader, and the speech he delivered at the Hermitage Wednesday may be the closest thing to a presidential biography he’s read.
By Rick Holmes / Opinions/Mass. Political Editor / March 24, 2017
NASHVILLE – The Hermitage, the plantation home of President Andrew Jackson, was closed to the public Wednesday for a special visit from President Donald J. Trump. So I went out on Tuesday, looking for links between presidents number 7 and 45. They aren’t hard to find.
Unlike most presidents, Trump doesn’t consider himself a student of history. He’s not much of a reader, and the speech he delivered at the Hermitage Wednesday may be the closest thing to a presidential biography he’s read.
But Trump seems to have found his presidential role model. After the election, people started comparing Trump’s victory to Jackson’s populist uprising in 1828, and the president-elect warmed to the narrative. He ordered a portrait of Jackson hung prominently in the Oval Office.
At the Hermitage, Trump underlined the association, calling himself “a big fan” of Old Hickory.
Jackson “defied an arrogant elite,” Trump said. “Sound familiar?”
As the audience laughed, Trump mugged: “Oh Andrew, I feel your pain.”
The similarities between the two presidents go deeper than just populist rhetoric. Jackson and Trump both ran for office as outsiders challenging the Washington establishment, both consider themselves champions of the working man.
Both were celebrity candidates. Jackson was the hero of the Battle of New Orleans. Trump built his brand through real estate deals and reality TV. Jackson invented the modern political party by building an organization around himself. Trump staged what amounted to a hostile takeover of the GOP.
JAMELLE BOUIE: Trump sees himself in Andrew Jackson and deserves the Jackson legacy, but not for the reasons he’d like to think. READ MORE
Both believe in the strong executive. Jackson greatly expanded the powers of the presidency. He paid little heed to the preferences of the Congress, the rulings of the Supreme Court or the obligations of treaties with the Indians, including the ones he negotiated and signed. Trump is already clashing with the courts over his own sweeping executive orders.
If Trump asked, his hosts would have explained that, while there is no evidence of unusual abuse of the slaves at the Hermitage, when the Union Army took control of Nashville in 1862, they were quick to abandon the plantation and take their shot at freedom.
Jackson expressed no regrets or moral qualms about owning slaves. The closest Trump came to acknowledging this part of Jackson’s legacy was a brief mention that Jackson “was a flawed man, a product of his time.”
I suspected Trump might use the occasion of Jackson’s 250th birthday to reverse the Obama administration’s decision to replace Jackson with Harriett Tubman on the $20 bill, which he criticized last year as political correctness. But he didn’t, choosing not to reward the slaveholder while punishing the slave – at least not this week
What Jackson called Indian Removal, we’d today call ethnic cleansing – and even that is a euphemism for the suffering and deaths of thousands at his hands on what the Cherokees call the “trail of tears.” Trump might call it “deportation.”
Jackson’s presidency ended 180 years ago; history has judged him the most consequential president of the early republic. Trump’s presidency, and his history lessons, have just begun.
Rick Holmes can be reached at rick@rickholmes.net. You can follow his journey at www.rickholmes.net. Like him on Facebook at Holmes & Co, on Twitter @HolmesAndCo.
Leave a Reply